Відео

I have dozens of questions: 1. Have you ever witnessed in your labs a neutrino -neutrino collisions? I can guess it would be VERY hard to accelerate these charge-less point-like illusive particles :-) 2. Or can we have a backdoor hack to imagine this suggested collision indirectly with electron/positron decay or more practically during electron-positron annihilation? Running backward Feynman's diagrams? 3. If all objects (from hydrogen nucleus to AGN) produce neutrinos, could there be a strong correlation between gravity and neutrinos, where neutrinos are 'things' that zip through everything, and gravitational field is a standing density gradient wave of the 'things'? Well, the unabbreviated alias of 'things' is neutrinoimmotus, kidding! Find the question in the humor, or I will try on #4. 4. A room is jam-packed with people whose gaze is fixed on a Martian that is walking to the stage. Their bulging eyes and synchronized head movement is palpable. How palpable is the bewilderment of an Earthling driving pass by a Marsling, say by a speed near C? Oh, sorry, this wasn't a question 😂 Drifted to somewhere. Thank you guys!

Just watched my sister defend her masters thesis on the lattice qcd paper :) I’m here trying to figure out what the heck it was about

I believe its a force. Einsteins THEORY about a fabric no one can see isnt sufficient to me. Sure, his theory can be used to predict some things in the universe, and it can be used to explain what gravity does, but it doesnt get down into a technical level what is holding everything down. There is no fabric around me. There is just air.

Couldn't get

great Subdifuse

anyone of class 11

It is off by 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000016 %

The prophecy is fulfilled!

How will the DUNE experiments help in understanding CP violation in the neutrino sector and its implications for the matter-antimatter asymmetry in the universe?

Great video. Just one question. Is there oscilation in the charged leptons? I guess if there ant itvwould be very tiny, ‘cause the mass of an electron is a very accurate propierty, so it wont’n be a lot of uncertainity on it

It’s the ability to move mass 🤔 But it also can create photons, or mass

Why use superposition to explain the slowing of light? Why not use Lenz's Law?

Gravity: An inertial river, that needs no battery to accelerate objects because it bypasses the resistance of mass by moving atoms directly.

Imagine if particle scientists spent no time researching and preparing before an experiment. Do you thinks they'd EVER discover ANYTHING?

dark matter may be error comes from einstein theory

Is he saying that for a photon, everything is in the same place? All distances are zero? How can everything occupy the same place?

"Why you can't move faster than light in non-curved space-time?" Here, corrected you

❤

ive heard this explanation before (as its the correct one) but Im unsure of how the light exits at exactly the same angle, what function of the wave 'remembers' the incident angle?

What the heck you mean that photons are ageless and experience the cosmos at the same time on its path? The observable universe is more than 90 billion light years so a photon can travel that distance in no time everywhere, anytime all at once? My goodness that’s just mind blowing. I wish I was born as a photon to experience that. Einstein really read God’s mind. 😭😭😭

Do photons experience time?... Yes: Because the speed of light is an ideal constant of the theory, that can vary, whilst passing through various mediums, in reality. So there is a certain "resistence" / Btw. we should stop insinuating truth, if we can't tell it. Approaching the speed of light is not moving with the speed of light, as it is like an infinite asymptotic approximation. The speed of light is on the crest, the dimensional barrier, separating 2 valleys. The tip of that crest is not like a blade (ideal, perfect c), but more like a "jittered path".

The first revelation is that there is no relativivistic mass. The 2nd is that not all physicists do not know what is going on or can't explain it. The third is that some people should not even think about going into physics. I am not speaking about anyone else but me when I say that I should have gotten a degree in woodworking. I could have had class. I could have been a contender. I could have been somebody. I could have made my own chair.

Dilation represents the meaning of activity? Personalized activities?

For your information - a month and a half ago an interesting paper appeared, which completely revealed all the secrets of neutrinos: "Direct derivation of the neutrino mass"

DNP & Alzofon Gravity Control

Those are some mega experiments going on out there...

Nice presentation (as usual). I don't know why they expect massive particles for dark matter. I expect electron-size scales, infact I expect it's a frozen sea of electron-positron pairs.

"We have no way to observe anything going on in that region". Said just seconds after stating as a fact that at the center of the black hole is a "singularity". How do you know that what's inside the event horizon is a mystery? What does it even mean for a black hole to have a "center"? A black hole is not an object in space, it IS space. The singularity is not a singularity in space, it's a singularity in time. It's not at the center of space, it's at the end of time.

Thank you! Howking Radiation!

So photons are gods all this time

Probably because of the quantum vacuum. If the vacuum wasn't there I'd imagine there would be a lot more certainty. Who knows

Could you prove, using nutrions, that the speed of light can be at diffrent speeds based on energy of the partical; Useing zenos paradox some infinitys can be larger than other infinitys so if we imagine the speed of light an an infinity relative to the object moving at the speed of light(because an object moving at the speed of light would have infinite mass) could we observe how var the netruino travled and the speed it must have travled it. Or is the speed of mass more like a set rule where it must take X amount of Time to get to point b. Ps im a highschool student idk what im talking about

How would you proove proton decay with netruinos

Before you even get down to Planck scales, wouldn’t the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle come into play? How are you even going to localize something to that size?

How many neutrinos pass through an average sized Sandtrout, in a day?

Great stuff!

Yes.. time in their reference frame doesnt stop.

Why we Cant Create Gravity ? I known the anwser , we cant do that , but its interesting , we can manipulate electrical and magnetic field , but with gravity , we cant ,its like time , we cabmnt push a button and make a gravity field ...thats will be cool ,there is no known way to transfor electromagnetic energy to gravity

But if put a litle quatum mechanics in this , its still wrong, couse that mass m is not so simple , that mass after all is Energy too , the Energy of the glouns gluing the quarks + the mass of the particles given by our friend the higgs Field Most of the mass m is just Energy binding couse the higs mass is very little ... Yuo need to take this acount but who knows😊

Well, this scientist I think is just trying to redirect peoples opinions to make them think that this is almost impossible. This technology it’s available but is used by a secret agency on military operations, they don’t want this technology to come out for national security.

I was hoping that there would turn out to be three generations of Higgs bosons but that seems only hold for leptons and quarks.

Please no vocal fry

Perhaps a more accessible way to think about light speed and the passage of time is to think of certain super hero movies like the Zack Snyder’s Justice League and X Men Days of Future Past. When speedsters, like the Flash, move quickly, everything around them slows down. Forget about the “time”component, and just think about the movement of other objects around them - they slow down to the point that they’re essentially frozen. In the case of photons, things slow down to a complete stop. This way of thinking about it can actually be “visualised” by most people, while the physicist explanation doesn’t give us anything we can easily relate to in the real world.

So when Beetlegeuse goes nova "soon", we will first know because of neutrinos? That is so cool, imagining that every telescope can be trained on Beetlegeuse before it happens. What is the delay? I don't want to miss it. ;)

They answer the question in the first minute. No.

Why are the neutrinos named after electron tau etc.